<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trapped in Bourne Shell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hotaboutlinux.com/2009/02/trapped-in-bourne-shell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hotaboutlinux.com/2009/02/trapped-in-bourne-shell/</link>
	<description>For Those Who Like to Dig Deeper</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 19:42:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
		<item>
		<title>By: Dean</title>
		<link>http://www.hotaboutlinux.com/2009/02/trapped-in-bourne-shell/comment-page-1/#comment-1495</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 03:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hotaboutlinux.com/?p=7#comment-1495</guid>
		<description>This article is full of fallacies.  It is confounding Bourne shell syntax (on which the modern POSIX shell dash is based) with implementation issues in the SVR4 shell.  Using [ instead of [[ isn&#039;t a sin; [ is a builtin on dash too: it doesn&#039;t fork so the &quot;compelling reason&quot; in the article is moot.  dash is faster than bash, so the argument about shell syntax versus builtins is redundant: if you wanted speed, you wouldn&#039;t use bash in the first place (look up BUGS in the bash manpage, bash is &quot;too big and too slow&quot;).

The sentence about #!/bin/sh &quot;still invoking bash&quot; under busybox is either wrong or very poorly-worded.

The Bourne shell syntax has been standardised in POSIX, portability is a good enough reason for making shell scripts POSIX-compatible.  If lazy people stopped using bashisms then more linux distributions could follow Ubuntu and Debian&#039;s lead and have /bin/sh point to dash by default, making things faster for everybody.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is full of fallacies.  It is confounding Bourne shell syntax (on which the modern POSIX shell dash is based) with implementation issues in the SVR4 shell.  Using [ instead of [[ isn&#8217;t a sin; [ is a builtin on dash too: it doesn&#8217;t fork so the &#8220;compelling reason&#8221; in the article is moot.  dash is faster than bash, so the argument about shell syntax versus builtins is redundant: if you wanted speed, you wouldn&#8217;t use bash in the first place (look up BUGS in the bash manpage, bash is &#8220;too big and too slow&#8221;).</p>
<p>The sentence about #!/bin/sh &#8220;still invoking bash&#8221; under busybox is either wrong or very poorly-worded.</p>
<p>The Bourne shell syntax has been standardised in POSIX, portability is a good enough reason for making shell scripts POSIX-compatible.  If lazy people stopped using bashisms then more linux distributions could follow Ubuntu and Debian&#8217;s lead and have /bin/sh point to dash by default, making things faster for everybody.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
